[1]安淇,肖华斌,*,等.国外城市绿地生态系统文化服务研究进展[J].山东建筑大学学报,2020,(01):76-82.[doi:10.12077/sdjz.2020.01.012]
 AN Qi,XIAO Huabin,*,et al.The research progress of foreign cultural ecosystem services of urban green space[J].Journal of Shandong jianzhu university,2020,(01):76-82.[doi:10.12077/sdjz.2020.01.012]
点击复制

国外城市绿地生态系统文化服务研究进展()
分享到:

《山东建筑大学学报》[ISSN:1673-7644/CN:37-1449/TU]

卷:
期数:
2020年01期
页码:
76-82
栏目:
综合述评
出版日期:
2020-02-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
The research progress of foreign cultural ecosystem services of urban green space
文章编号:
1673-7644(2020)01-0076-07
作者:
安淇1肖华斌12*张培元3刘莹1
(1.山东建筑大学 建筑城规学院,山东 济南 250101;2.山东建筑大学 生态规划与景观设计研究所,山东 济南 250101;3.山东建筑大学 艺术学院,山东 济南 250101)
Author(s):
AN Qi1 XIAO Huabin12*ZHANG Peiyuan3 LIU Ying1
(1. School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan 250101, China; 2. Institute of Ecological Planning and Landscape Design, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan 250101, China; 3. School of Art, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan 250101, China)
关键词:
城市绿地生态系统文化服务知识图谱CiteSpace
Keywords:
urban green space cultural ecosystem services knowledge map CiteSpace
分类号:
TU986
DOI:
10.12077/sdjz.2020.01.012
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
城市绿地生态系统文化服务对改善城市人居环境,提升人类健康福祉具有重要意义,开展国外城市绿地生态系统文化服务研究可为我国城市绿地的相关研究提供理论和实践参考。文章从客观计量视角,基于知识图谱软件CiteSpace分析了国外城市绿地生态系统文化服务研究发展脉络、知识基础及研究热点,近十年国外相关研究已形成较为完整的知识结构,研究视角多元,知识基础明确;研究热点集中在城市绿地CES效益与人类福祉关系、城市绿地CES选择偏好与权衡、城市绿地CES价值量化与规划应用3个方面;展望了今后我国城市绿地CES研究在理论与实践层面的研究方向。
Abstract:
Cultural ecosystem services (CES) of urban green space are of great significance for improving urban living environment and promoting human health well-being. The study on cultural ecosystem services of urban green space abroad can provide theoretical and practical references for the related research on urban green space in China. This paper sets objective measurement as the perspective, attempts to analyze the historical development trends, knowledge base, and research hotspots of foreign study by using a scientific knowledge visualizing software-CiteSpace, foreign study has formed a complete knowledge structure with multiple perspectives and a clear knowledge base in nearly a decade, the relationship between CES benefits of urban green space and human well-being, the preference of urban green space CES and trade-off, the value quantification and planning application of urban green space CES are the hotspots in foreign study; the future research direction of urban green space CES in China at the theoretical and practical levels is prospected.

参考文献/References:

[1]王俊帝, 刘志强, 邵大伟, 等. 基于CiteSpace的国外城市绿地研究进展的知识图谱分析[J]. 中国园林, 2018,34(4):5-11. [2]刘颂, 杨莹. 生态系统服务供需平衡视角下的城市绿地系统规划策略探讨[J]. 中国城市林业, 2018,16(2):1-4. [3]Langemeyer J, Baro F, Roebeling P, et al. Contrasting values of cultural ecosystem services in urban areas: The case of park Montjuic in Barcelona[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2015,12(SI):178-186. [4]Millennium E A. Ecosystems and human well-being: A framework for assessment[R]. Washington D. C.: Island Press, 2003. [5]邱玲, 陈泓, 高天. 融合生物多样性与景观认知评价的城市绿地规划与管理之研究综述[J]. 中国园林, 2016,32(1):92-97. [6]宋瑞, 牛青翠, 朱玲, 等. 基于绿地8类感知属性法的复愈性环境构建研究——以宝鸡市人民公园为例[J]. 中国园林, 2018,34(S1):110-114. [7]李想, 雷硕, 冯骥, 等. 北京市绿地生态系统文化服务功能价值评估[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2019,33(6):33-39. [8]彭婉婷, 刘文倩, 蔡文博, 等. 基于参与式制图的城市保护地生态系统文化服务价值评价——以上海共青森林公园为例[J]. 应用生态学报, 2019,30(2):439-448. [9]戴培超, 张绍良, 刘润, 等. 生态系统文化服务研究进展——基于Web of Science分析[J]. 生态学报, 2019,39(5):1-12. [10]秦晓楠, 卢小丽, 武春友. 国内生态安全研究知识图谱——基于Citespace的计量分析[J]. 生态学报, 2014,34(13):3693-3703. [11]陈悦, 陈超美, 刘则渊, 等. CiteSpace知识图谱的方法论功能[J]. 科学学研究, 2015,33(2):242-253. [12]赵丹群. 基于CiteSpace的科学知识图谱绘制若干问题探讨[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2012,35(10):56-58. [13]张妮, 王婧媛. 基于CiteSpace的知识图谱国内外研究热点分析与趋势展望[J]. 情报资料工作, 2017(3):33-41. [14]李志明, 樊荣甜. 国外开放空间研究演进与前沿热点的可视化分析[J]. 国际城市规划, 2017,32(6):34-41. [15]王兰, 张雅兰, 邱明, 等. 以体力活动多样性为导向的城市绿地空间设计优化策略[J]. 中国园林, 2019,35(1):56-61. [16]Tzoulas K, Korpela K, Venn S, et al. Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using Green Infrastructure: A literature review[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2007,81(3):167-178. [17]Irvine K N, Warber S L, Devine-Wright P, et al. Understanding urban green space as a health resource: A qualitative comparison of visit motivation and derived effects among park users in sheffield, UK[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2013,10(1):417-442. [18]Daniel T C, Muhar A, Arnberger A, et al. Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012,109(23):8812-8819. [19]Plieninger T, Dijks S, Oteros-Rozas E, et al. Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level[J]. Land Use Policy, 2013,33(4):118-129. [20]Buchel S, Frantzeskaki N. Citizens voice: A case study about perceived ecosystem services by urban park users in Rotterdam, the Netherlands[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2015,12(SI):169-177. [21]李杰, 李慧杰, 陈伟炯, 等. 国内社会科学研究中知识图谱应用现状分析[J]. 图书情报研究, 2019,12(1):74-81. [22]刘文平. 景观服务及其空间流动:连接风景园林与人类福祉的纽带[J]. 风景园林, 2018,25(3):100-104. [23]彭慧蕴, 谭少华. 城市公园环境的恢复性效应影响机制研究——以重庆为例[J]. 中国园林, 2018,34(9):5-9. [24]Martinico F, La Rosa D, Privitera R. Green oriented urban development for urban ecosystem services provision in a medium sized city in southern Italy[J]. iForest-Biogeosciences and Forestry, 2014,7(6):385-395. [25]Soga M, Gaston K J, Koyanagi T F, et al. Urban residents perceptions of neighbourhood nature: Does the extinction of experience matter?[J]. Biological Conservation, 2016,203(11):143-150. [26]Qureshi S, Breuste J H, Jim C Y. Differential community and the perception of urban green spaces and their contents in the megacity of Karachi, Pakistan[J]. Urban Ecosystems, 2013,16(4):853-870. [27]Bryce R, Irvine K N, Church A, et al. Subjective well-being indicators for large-scale assessment of cultural ecosystem services[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2016,21(6):258-269. [28]Garcia X, Benages-Albert M, Pavon D, et al. Public participation GIS for assessing landscape values and improvement preferences in urban stream corridors[J]. Applied Geography, 2017,87(10):184-196. [29]傅伯杰, 于丹丹. 生态系统服务权衡与集成方法[J]. 资源科学, 2016,38(1):1-9. [30]彭建, 胡晓旭, 赵明月,等. 生态系统服务权衡研究进展:从认知到决策[J]. 地理学报, 2017,72(6):960-973. [31]Turner K G, Odgaard M V, Bocher P K, et al. Bundling ecosystem services in Denmark: Trade-offs and synergies in a cultural landscape[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2014,125(SI):89-104. [32]Kabisch N, Haase D. Green justice or just green? Provision of urban green spaces in Berlin, Germany[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2014,122(2):129-139. [33]Hauck J, Goerg C, Varjopuro R, et al. "Maps have an air of authority": Potential benefits and challenges of ecosystem service maps at different levels of decision making[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2013,4(SI):25-32. [34]Casado-Arzuaga I, Onaindia M, Madariaga I, et al. Mapping recreation and aesthetic value of ecosystems in the Bilbao Metropolitan Greenbelt (northern Spain) to support landscape planning[J]. Landscape Ecology, 2014,29(8):1393-1405. [35]Richards D R, Tuncer B. Using image recognition to automate assessment of cultural ecosystem services from social media photographs[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2018,31(SI):318-325. [36]孙孝平,李双,余建平,等.基于土地利用变化情景的生态系统服务价值评估——以钱江源国家公园体制试点区为例[J].生物多样性,2019,27(1):51-63. [37]张炜,刘晓明.武汉市蓝绿基础设施调节和支持服务价值评估研究[J].中国园林,2019,35(10):51-56. [38]韩依纹,张舒,殷利华.大都市区绿地碳储存能力及其空间分布特点探究——以韩国首尔市为例[J].景观设计学,2019,7(2):55-65.

相似文献/References:

[1]鲁敏1,秦碧莲1,牛朝阳2,等.城市植物与绿地固碳释氧能力研究进展[J].山东建筑大学学报,2015,(4):363.
 Lu Min,Qin Bilian,Niu Chaoyang,et al.Research progress of the ability of carbon sequestration and oxygen release of urban plant and green space[J].Journal of Shandong jianzhu university,2015,(01):363.
[2]鲁敏,高鑫,纪园园,等.济南市中心城区绿地固碳释氧能力研究[J].山东建筑大学学报,2017,(06):511.[doi:10.12077/sdjz.2017.32.06.001]
 Lu Min,Gao Xin,Ji Yuanyuan,et al.Study on carbon fixation and oxygen release capacity of urban green space in Jinan[J].Journal of Shandong jianzhu university,2017,(01):511.[doi:10.12077/sdjz.2017.32.06.001]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2020-01-06 基金项目:教育部人文社会科学研究基金项目(14YJCZH166);华南理工大学亚热带建筑科学国家重点实验室开放研究基金项目(2016ZB11);济南市哲学社会科学规划重点项目(JNSK18B15) 作者简介:安淇(1994-),女,在读硕士,主要从事地景规划与生态修复等方面的研究.E-mail:1037526521@qq.com 通讯作者*:肖华斌(1980-),男,副教授,博士,主要从事地景规划与生态修复、绿色基础设施与健康福祉等方面的研究.E-mail:xiaohuabin@foxmail.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-12-16