[1]邵广彪,*,李文琛,等.紧邻基坑双曲砖拱建筑物复合保护技术研究[J].山东建筑大学学报,2019,34(04):14-19.[doi:10.12077/sdjz.2019.04.003]
 SHAO Guangbiao,*,LI Wenchen,et al.Study on composite protection technology of double curved brick arch building adjacent to foundation pit[J].Journal of Shandong jianzhu university,2019,34(04):14-19.[doi:10.12077/sdjz.2019.04.003]
点击复制

紧邻基坑双曲砖拱建筑物复合保护技术研究()
分享到:

《山东建筑大学学报》[ISSN:1673-7644/CN:37-1449/TU]

卷:
34
期数:
2019年04期
页码:
14-19
栏目:
研究论文
出版日期:
2019-07-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Study on composite protection technology of double curved brick arch building adjacent to foundation pit
文章编号:
1673-7644(2019)04-0014-06
作者:
邵广彪1*李文琛1刘国辉2徐以政2
(1.山东建筑大学 土木工程学院,山东 济南 250101;2. 山东建大工程鉴定加固研究院,山东 济南 250014)
Author(s):
SHAO Guangbiao1* LI Wenchen1 LIU Guohui2 et al.
(1. School of Civil Engineering, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan 250101, China; 2. Institute of Engineering Appraisal and Strengthening of Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan 250014, China)
关键词:
双曲砖拱屋盖紧邻基坑施工全过程复合保护技术
Keywords:
double curved brick arch roof adjacent to the foundation pit whole construction process composite protection technique
分类号:
TU43
DOI:
10.12077/sdjz.2019.04.003
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
基坑施工易造成周边建筑物损伤破坏,紧邻基坑的建筑物保护技术的研究可以为城市地下空间开发建设提供重要的工程技术指导。文章以某重要双曲砖拱建筑为例,提出了基于深基坑施工全过程的建筑物复合保护技术,根据监测数据研究了地下工程施工对周边土体及建筑物的影响规律,并对复合保护技术的有效性进行了验证。结果表明:在复合保护技术支持下,基坑施工产生的建筑物差异沉降约为3 mm,满足差异沉降控制指标;复合保护技术中桁架式内支撑支护体系和精细回灌技术分别较好地控制了土体变形和地下水位的动态平衡,在紧邻基坑双曲砖拱建筑保护中发挥了重要作用。
Abstract:
Foundation pit construction is easy to cause damage to surrounding buildings and the study of the protection technology of buildings adjacent to the foundation pit can provide important engineering technical guidance for the development and construction of urban underground space. Taking an important hyperbolic brick arch building as an example, this paper puts forward the building composite protection technology based on the whole construction process of deep foundation pit. According to the monitoring data, the influence rule of underground construction on surrounding soil and buildings is studied and the effectiveness of composite protection technology is verified. The results show that: With the support of composite protection technology, the differential settlement of buildings generated by foundation pit construction is about 3 mm, which meets the differential settlement control standard; The trussed internal support system and fine recharge technology of composite protection technology can control soil deformation and the dynamic balance of groundwater level, play an important role in the protection of the hyperbolic brick arch building adjacent to the foundation pit.

参考文献/References:

[1]Hsieh P G, Ou C Y. Shape of ground surface settlement profiles caused by excavation[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1998, 35(6): 1004-1017.[2]郑刚,朱合华, 刘新荣,等.基坑工程与地下工程安全及环境影响控制[J]. 土木工程学报, 2016, 49(6): 1-24.[3]郑刚, 颜志雄, 雷华阳,等.基坑开挖对临近桩基影响的实测及有限元数值模拟分析[J].岩土工程学报, 2007, 29(5): 638-643. [4]彭志雄,周元刚. 深基坑开挖对临近建筑物相互影响效应分析[J]. 施工技术, 2017, 46(8): 32-35.[5]李睿峰, 刘大刚, 王明年,等.基坑开挖对邻近框架建筑物沉降的影响分析[J]. 路基工程, 2018 (1): 60-64. [6]李志伟. 软土地区深基坑开挖对邻近建筑物影响的三维有限元分析[D]. 天津:天津大学, 2011. [7]谭维佳, 王新刚, 胡斌. 不同建筑物对地铁基坑相互效应影响分析[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2014, 10(4): 868-872.[8]JGJ 120—2012, 建筑基坑支护技术规程[S].北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2012. [9]朱晓明, 祝东海. 建国初期苏联建筑规范的转移—以同济大学原电工馆双曲砖拱建造为例[J]. 建筑遗产, 2017(1): 94-105. [10]郑刚, 杜一鸣, 刁钰. 隔离桩对基坑外既有隧道变形控制的优化分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2015, 34(S1): 3499- 3509. [11]曾晓鑫, 丁文湘, 彭玲,等.隔离桩桩径对基坑开挖引起既有地铁隧道位移的影响[J]. 铁道建筑, 2017 (6): 95-97. [12]徐长节, 曾晓鑫, 戚晓锴,等.拱形双排隔离桩对既有隧道的保护效果研究[J]. 防灾减灾工程学报, 2018, 38(4): 633-641. [13]Ou J P, Li H. Structural health monitoring in mainland china: review and future trends[J]. Structural Health Monitoring, 2010, 9(3): 219-230.[14]左自波, 龚剑, 吴小建,等.地下工程施工和运营期监测的研究与应用进展[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2017, 13(S1): 294-305.[15]贾锋. 富水半砂半岩隧道下穿建筑物注浆技术数值模拟研究[J]. 铁道勘察, 2019,45(1): 90-95.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2019-06-19基金项目:教育部创新团队发展计划项目(IRT_17R69)作者简介:邵广彪(1978-),男,副教授,博士,主要从事城市地下工程开挖支护技术及地下工程防灾减灾等方面的研究.E-mail: sgbou@126.com[*通讯作者]
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-07-31