[1]王升歌,宋凤*,高宜生,等.基于特尔斐法的海草房传统村落活力研究——以荣成市俚岛镇海草房传统村落为例[J].山东建筑大学学报,2017,(06):551-559.[doi:10.12077/sdjz.2017.06.007]
 Wang Shengge,Song Feng*,Gao Yisheng,et al.Study on vitality of the sea straw house traditional villages based on Delphi method:A case study of the sea straw house traditional villages in Lidao Town[J].Journal of Shandong jianzhu university,2017,(06):551-559.[doi:10.12077/sdjz.2017.06.007]
点击复制

基于特尔斐法的海草房传统村落活力研究——以荣成市俚岛镇海草房传统村落为例()
分享到:

《山东建筑大学学报》[ISSN:1673-7644/CN:37-1449/TU]

卷:
期数:
2017年06期
页码:
551-559
栏目:
研究论文
出版日期:
2017-12-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Study on vitality of the sea straw house traditional villages based on Delphi method:A case study of the sea straw house traditional villages in Lidao Town
文章编号:
1673-7644(2017)06-0551-09
作者:
王升歌宋凤*高宜生徐晓蕾
(山东建筑大学 建筑城规学院,山东 济南 250101)
Author(s):
Wang Shengge Song Feng*Gao Yishenget al.
(School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan 250101, China)
关键词:
海草房传统村落村落活力影响因素
Keywords:
sea straw house traditional villages village vitality influencing factors
分类号:
TU986
DOI:
10.12077/sdjz.2017.06.007
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
海草房传统村落是我国传统村落保护体系的重要组成部分,如何维持海草房传统村落的生命活力成为村落能否永续发展之根本,因此对海草房传统村落活力影响因素进行评价是科学、合理制定相关保护和可持续发展的前提和基础。文章基于海草房传统村落活力的相关定义、特征及其影响因素,采用特尔婓专家评定法,构建了村落人口数量、经济收入、传统文化传承度、民居品质、传统村落风貌、村域生态环境等6个海草房传统村落活力影响因素的评价体系;依据此对山东省荣成市俚岛镇的36处海草房传统村落进行打分评价和分级评定;提出了海草房传统村落活力延续策略。结果表明:得分≥80分的一共有4处村落,其中烟墩角村的得分最高为90分;得分在60~80分的共有11处村落,40~60分的共有12处;<40分的共有9处,其中石山东家村的得分最低为26分。
Abstract:
The sea straw house traditional villages are important parts of the traditional village protection system in China. How to maintain the vitality of the sea straw house traditional villages has become the basis for the sustainable development of the villages. Therefore, the evaluation of the influencing factors on the vitality of the sea straw house traditional villages is a prerequisite and basis for scientific and rational development of relevant protection and sustainable development. Based on relevant definitions, characteristics and related influencing factors of the vitality of the sea straw house traditional villages, through Delphi evaluation method, this paper analyzes six evaluation systems about the vitality of the sea straw house: traditional villages the population quantity, economic income, traditional culture heritage, the quality of residential living the sea straw house, the traditional village style and ecological environment. In addition, according to the evaluation system of the influencing factors on the vitality of villages, this paper marks, evaluates and grades thirtysix sea straw house traditional villages in Lidao Town, Rongcheng City, Shandong Province, and presents sustainable strategies for the sea straw house traditional villages. As a result, with the score of 80 and above, there are four villages in total, Yandunjiao Village gaining the highest score (90 points); there are eleven villages with scores of 60-80 points; there are twelve villages with scores of 40-60 points; there are nine villages with scores below 40 points, Shishandongjia Village gaining the lowest score (26 points).

参考文献/References:

[1]卿卫平,冯骥才.传统村落保护需要国家作为[N].中华建筑报,2014-03-04.[2]纪小美,付业勤,朱翠兰.中国传统村落的地域分异与影响因素研究[J].沈阳建筑大学学报(社会科学版),2015,17(5):452-460.[3]吴岩,吕爱民.胶东民居海草房的生态性研究[J].华中建筑,2012,30(7):149-151.[4]黄永健.东楮岛村海草房营造工艺研究[D].济南:山东大学,2014.[5]Yu H.D., Xuan Y.. A study of community street space vitality ReconstructionSampled by Chengdu Tongzilin Community[J].Advanced Materials Research,2014,962-965:2626-2630.[6]龙花楼. 乡村生产生活生态空间重构的土地整治策略[C].西宁:中国自然资源学会土地资源研究专业委员会,2013.[7]吴承照,肖建莉.古村落可持续发展的文化生态策略——以高迁古村落为例[J].城市规划汇刊,2003(4):56-60.[8]刘作良,邓颖林,李笑娜.基于层次分析法和特尔斐法的土地集约利用评价研究——以桂林高新区为例[J].石家庄铁路职业技术学院学报,2010,9(3):20-23.[9]宋凤,肖华斌,张建华.活态保护目标下北方泉水村落环境价值评价研究[J].山东建筑大学学报,2015,30(6):564-571.[10]鲁敏,郭振,宁静.湿地园林—生态、湿地、地域文脉与园林美的统一——滕州荆泉风景区湿地园林景观规划设计[J].山东建筑大学学报,2010,25(1):54-57, 78.[11]陈虹.城市山地公园园林空间活力研究[D].济南:山东建筑大学,2016.[12]黄全丰.农村居民点外部空间活力调查与研究[D].重庆:重庆大学,2015.[13]鸿茹.提升传统村落的生命活力[J].城乡建设,2012(3):1.[14]周樟垠,曾庆云,陈华智.社区营造视角下传统村落的保护与利用——以梅湾村为例[J].小城镇建设,2016(9):38-42, 49.[15]扈万泰,王力国,舒沐晖.城乡规划编制中的“三生空间”划定思考[J].城市规划,2016,40(5):21-26, 53.[16]Galea S., Uddin M., Koenen K.. The urban environment and mental disorders epigenetic links[J]. Epigenetics,2011,6(4):400-404.[17]Dolores G., Salvador B.. Exploring the application of the Delphi method as a forecasting tool in Information Systems and Technologies research[J]. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management,2014,26(9) :987-999.[18]Su M.R., Yang Z.F., Chen B.. Relative urban ecosystem health assessment: a method integrating comprehensive evaluation and detailed analysis[J]. Ecohealth,2010,7(4):459-472.[19]Griffith D.A.. Geographic sampling of urban soils for contaminant mapping: how many samples and from where[J]. Environment Geochemical Health,2008,30(6):495-509.[20]肖鸿.太阳岛风景区空间活力营造研究[D].哈尔滨:东北林业大学,2016.[21]熊贝妮.基于空间活力分析的城市设计方法探讨——以武汉市机场二通道出城路段城市设计为例[C].秦皇岛:2010城市发展与规划,2010.[22]胡燕,陈晟,曹玮,等.传统村落的概念和文化内涵[J].城市发展研究,2014,21(1):10-13.[23]马航.中国传统村落的延续与演变——传统聚落规划的再思考[J].城市规划学刊,2006(1):102-107.[24]李伯华,尹莎,刘沛林,等.湖南省传统村落空间分布特征及影响因素分析[J].经济地理,2015,35(2):189-194.[25]佟玉权,龙花楼.贵州民族传统村落的空间分异因素[J].经济地理,2015,35(3):133-137, 93.[26]张剑.基于可持续性设计的传统村落景观风貌传承与更新研究——以烟墩角村为例[J].装饰,2017(1):140-141.[27]许少亮.文脉延续理念的传统村落活力再造策略探讨——以南靖云水谣通美庄园概念性规划设计为例[J].福建建筑,2016(12):1-8.[28]张东,马运超.基于保护和发展思路的传统村落街坊更新研究——以河南裴城核心街坊为例[J].华中建筑,2015(4):90-95.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2017-10-19 基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(51408342);教育部人文社会科学研究基金项目(14YJCZH166);山东省自然科学基金面上项目(2016ZRB01AGR); 华南理工大学亚热带建筑科学国家重点实验室开放研究基金项目(2016ZB11);山东建筑大学博士科研基金项目(XNBS1012) 作者简介:王升歌(1992-),男,在读硕士,主要从事风景园林规划与设计等方面的研究.E-mail:306114198@qq.com 通讯作者*:宋凤(1976-),女,副教授,博士,主要从事风景园林规划与设计等方面的研究.E-mail:417929269@qq.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-01-22