[1]宋凤,肖华斌,张建华.活态保护目标下北方泉水村落环境价值评价研究[J].山东建筑大学学报,2015,(6):564-571.
 Song Feng,Xiao Huabin,Zhang Jianhua.Research on the evaluation of spring village in the north of China under the active protection target[J].Journal of Shandong jianzhu university,2015,(6):564-571.
点击复制

活态保护目标下北方泉水村落环境价值评价研究()
分享到:

《山东建筑大学学报》[ISSN:1673-7644/CN:37-1449/TU]

卷:
期数:
2015年6期
页码:
564-571
栏目:
研究论文
出版日期:
2015-12-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Research on the evaluation of spring village in the north of China under the active protection target
作者:
宋凤肖华斌张建华
山东建筑大学 建筑城规学院,山东 济南 250101
Author(s):
Song FengXiao HuabinZhang Jianhua
(Institute of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan 250101, China)
关键词:
活态保护泉水村落多重价值评价体系
Keywords:
active protection spring village multiple values evaluation system
分类号:
TU986
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
泉水村落是我国传统村落保护体系重要组成部分,对其进行价值评价是科学、合理制定相关保护和可持续发展策略的基础和前提。文章以活态保护理念为基本出发点,考虑到泉水村落的发展过程以及泉水与生活、生产、生态协同发展的贡献,采用特尔菲专家评定法和层次分析法,从村落自然环境、人工环境和社会环境等三方面构建了19个价值评价因子及47个表征指标做为主要特征的北方泉水村落的价值评价体系;并对我国北方四省的89处泉水村落的环境价值进行了应用评价和分级评定。结果表明:综合价值评价为三星级泉水村落18处,其中山西省阳泉市平定县的娘子关村得分最高;评价等级一般的二星级泉水村落有河北省邢台市皇寺镇皇寺村等52处;评价等级较差的一星级泉水村落有19处,其中山东省济南市长清区马山镇的双泉村得分最低。
Abstract:
The protection of spring village is an important part of traditional village protection system in China. The research on the evaluation of spring village is the basis and premise of scientific and reasonable formulation of the spring village’s protection and sustainable development strategy. Taking activated protection concept as the basic starting point, considering the spring’s contribution to the synergetic development of the spring village’s living, producing and ecology, this paper constructed the spring village’s environmental evaluation system with Delphi expert assessment method and AHP, with 19 value factors and 47 characterization indicators as main characteristics and from the aspects of natural environmental, artificial environment and social environment. By using the evaluation system, the researchers evaluated 89 spring villages which settle in four provinces of northern China. Research results show: 18 spring villages meet three-star standard, Nangziguan village got the highest scores among villages; 52 spring villages were grade as two-star standard, such as Shuyuan village; 19 spring villages were identified as one-star standard with scores bellow 60, such as Shuangquan village.

相似文献/References:

[1]张建华,刘静如,张玺.鲁中山区泉水村落的形态类型及利用策略[J].山东建筑大学学报,2013,(03):204.

更新日期/Last Update: 2016-01-13